Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
Estella Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03925
Plaintiff:
Abel Rodriguez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cromartie v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Gradilla
as 1:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Marcelino Segura Palmer
Respondent:
Gabriela Rodriguez Gradilla
Varela Rivera et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Carmen R. Varela Rivera and Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez-Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Juan Perez-Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04226
Plaintiff:
Hector Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
Joyce Rodriguez
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03039
Plaintiff:
Monica Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
