Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Smiley v. The View Channel 9 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00210
Plaintiff: Andre Smiley, r
Defendant: View Channel 9, Barbara Walters and Red Head
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Cincinnati Bar Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff: Yvette Barbara Baldwin
Defendant: Cincinnati Bar Association, Cincinnati Bar Foundation, Rene T. McPhedran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Entec Polymers, LLC et al v. Cambridge Tool And Die Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00624
Plaintiff: Entec Polymers, LLC and Channel Prime Alliance, LLC
Defendant: Cambridge Tool And Die Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Leyse v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00237
Plaintiff: Mark Leyse
Defendant: Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc, Clear Channel Communications, Inc. and Critical Mass Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00756
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
United States Of America v. International Harvester Employee Credit Union Account No. xxx29 in the name of Keith Channels, Sr. in the amount of $26,097.54
as 3:2007cv00327
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: International Harvester Employee Credit Union Account No. xxx29 in the name of Keith Channels, Sr. in the amount of $26,097.54
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?