Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Howard et al v. Preble County Sheriff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00410
Defendant: Dean Petry, Fred Kerler, Kimberly Dees and others
Plaintiff: Corbin J Howard and Emily R Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poling v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02227
Plaintiff: Tammy Dee Poling
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clendenin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02025
Plaintiff: Dee A. Clendenin
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salser v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01025
Plaintiff: Roger Dee Salser
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00756
Plaintiff: Dee A. Bryan
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Champion Signs, LLC v. Dee SIgn Co. et al
as 1:2013mc00046
Plaintiff: Champion Signs, LLC
Defendant: Dee SIgn Co. and Braden R. Huenefeld
Respondent: Hotel Burnet
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00865
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walter v. Mac Tools, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00549
Plaintiff: Dee C Walter
Defendant: Mac Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Type: Contract Franchise
Bond v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff: Charles E Bond
Defendant: Charles Cox, Dee Sandy and Miami County Commission Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?