Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Bucks County Employees Retirement System v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Bucks County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Petitioner:
AkademikerPension and Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Annuity, Pension and Topping Out Funds
Shaw v. Wozniak et al
as 2:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Traci M. Shaw
Defendant:
Richard Wozniak and City of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04136
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Shaw
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elkins v. Franklin Medical Center, et al.
as 2:2022cv03705
Plaintiff:
David Elkins
Defendant:
Franklin Medical Center, Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution, Warden K. Jeter Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Lorraine A. Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shaw v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05762
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Shaw
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03395
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dave Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01591
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Diann Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01344
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Robert Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doty et al v. Kroger Company, The
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shaw, Lenora Doty and Tracy Simpson
Defendant:
Kroger Company, The and The Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
