Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Baker v. Sodexo Inc.
as 1:2016cv00964
Plaintiff:
Pamela Baker
Defendant:
Sodexo, Inc. , Sodexo Management, Inc. , SDH Services West, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luke v. Eby et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Andy Eby, Jennifer Shockley, Krys Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barringer v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02518
Plaintiff:
Andy M. Barringer
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Andy Cheng Li et al v. Taco Bell of America, Inc
as 2:2014cv02297
Defendant:
Taco Bell of America, Inc
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andy Cheng Li and Fei Ying Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Estate of Andy Cheng Li et al v. Taco Bell of America, Inc
as 3:2014cv00391
Defendant:
Taco Bell of America, Inc
Plaintiff:
Estate of Andy Cheng Li and Fei Ying Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Monk v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00938
Plaintiff:
Andy Wayne Monk
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Japan Entertainment Group Co. Ltd. et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Japan Entertainment Group Co. Ltd., LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown and Luwana Pettus-Oglesby
Defendant:
Ethna Cooper, Joseph Deters, Andy Berghausen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Geraci v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Plaintiff:
Mattew A. Geraci
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Robert Peeler, Andy Stevers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
