Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Young v. Hooks We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff: Aaron E. Young
Defendant: Nicholas Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNoma v. Kasich et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff: Anthony DeNoma
Defendant: John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. Mohr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02681
Plaintiff: Samuel C. Stein
Defendant: Gary Mohr, John Doe, Wanza Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Hook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00158
Plaintiff: Michelle Van Hook
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Phillips et al v. DeWine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02730
Plaintiff: Ronald R. Phillips , Grady Brinkley , Raymond Tibbetts and others
Defendant: Mike DeWine , John R Kasich , Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Shawn Patrick Hooks
as 1:2014mc00062
Respondent: Shawn Patrick Hooks
Hook v. FirstCredit, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01272
Plaintiff: Karla Hook
Defendant: FirstCredit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hook v. IQ Receivable Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00748
Plaintiff: Karla Hook
Defendant: IQ Receivable Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hook v. JP Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00511
Plaintiff: Karla Hook
Defendant: JP Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?