Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Taylor v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2019cv03368
Plaintiff:
Maurice Taylor
Defendant:
City of Columbus and James Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Maurice Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh et al v. Erdos et al
as 1:2019cv00245
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Correctional Officers 1-10, Officer Dalton, Ronald Erdos and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Lee, Shamieke Pugh and Shamieke D. Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soledad v. DeWine et al
as 1:2018cv00572
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lee Soledad and Maurice Lee Soledad, r
Defendant:
Jacquenette S. Corgan, Maureen Yuhas, Sherri Bevan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Ohio Department of Rehab & Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
Christopher Foster, Donnell Perry, Matthew Hinston and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehab & Correction, Gary Mohr, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soledad v. Webb et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lee Soledad, r
Defendant:
Webb, Berry, Kennady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00585
Petitioner:
Maurice Jackson
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Ohio State of
as 1:2016cv00896
Petitioner:
Maurice Chapman, Sr.
Respondent:
Ohio State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. USA
as 1:2016cv00832
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
