Cases 21 - 30 of 1,422
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lange et al v. City of Piqua et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Alisha Lange, David Smith, Greg Neves and others
Defendant:
City of Piqua and Paul Oberdorfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Paul C Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson and Holly Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00062
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01472
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Melissa Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
