Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Weaver v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01650
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weaver v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2018cv00393
Petitioner:
Torace D. Weaver
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver v. City of Columbus et al
as 2:2018cv01142
Defendant:
Mark Gramlich and City of Columbus
Plaintiff:
bryan scott weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018oe01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Weaver et al v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2018cv01117
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Weaver and Robert Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Weaver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Burks v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jamual S. Burks
Defendant:
Christie Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. USA et al
as 3:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel R Weaver
Defendant:
USA and Michael P Huerta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
