Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Foster v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv01507
Petitioner:
Kent C. Foster
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaughan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gary Kent Gaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaughan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00333
Plaintiff:
Gary Kent Gaughan
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eads v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01715
Plaintiff:
Kent Eads
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kent v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
Deena Mae Kent
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Miller et al
as 2:2014cv00562
Plaintiff:
Aaron A Cole
Defendant:
Michelle Miller, Kent Litzenberger, Ralph Christman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Kent Webster
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiltz v. Moundbuilders Guidance Center et al
as 2:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Defendant:
Moundbuilders Guidance Center, Behavioral Health Care Partners, Inc., Forman and Associates Consulting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
