Cases 81 - 90 of 113
Chyi et al v. Intuitive Surgical Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00308
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Delos Cosgrove and others
Plaintiff:
Lindgren Chyi , Lucy Chyi , Edmund Eisnaugle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Xavier University et al
as 1:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
Dezmine Wells
Defendant:
Xavier University and Michael J. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breyer v. Xavier University et al
as 1:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Juliann Breyer
Defendant:
Xavier University and Michael Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Graham v. Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00963
Plaintiff:
Otto Graham
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Judy Graham v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01114
Plaintiff:
Judy Graham
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Graham v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Joan S. Graham and Thomas C. Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. and Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kubiak v. Barbas et al
as 3:2011cv00141
Defendant:
The AES Corporation, Barbara S. Graham, Pamela B. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kubiak, Catherine P. Holtmann, Patrick Nichting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 5951 Graham, Petoskey, Michigan, Real Property Located at
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
5951 Graham, Petoskey, Michigan, Real Property Located at
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
