Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Wilkinson et al v. City of Dayton Ohio et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WILKINSON, Keeley Nelson, Darlene Guynn and others
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio, Kamron Afzal, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03018
Plaintiff:
Catherine Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Debra Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Chloette Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nelson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Nelson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Scott Nelson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scoggins v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Michelle Scoggins
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., Bill Nelson and Menard, Inc. doing business as Midwest Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Mojica Taboada v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Nelson Mojica Taboada
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Danyelle Nelson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
India Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
