Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Gerald K Smith
Defendant:
D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaFave v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Norman LaFave
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wonser v. Norman et al
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wonser
Defendant:
Charles L. Norman, Andy Wilson and Thomas Stickrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01811
Plaintiff:
Brynn Norman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Diggs v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Norman Diggs
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drongowski et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02959
Plaintiff:
Norman Drongowski and Marti Drongowski
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02904
Plaintiff:
Richard Norman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. Rhymer et al
as 2:2023cv02426
Plaintiff:
Norman Brown and Diana Brown
Defendant:
Keith Rhymer and T&J Produce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Berry v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Norman L. Berry
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
