Cases 1 - 10 of 4,993
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sayers v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sayers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C R Bard Inc, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03035
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kolowena v. McDonald et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Toi-Allyson Kolowena
Defendant:
Elyzabeth Katryn McDonald, Jordan Fader, Riley Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02990
Plaintiff:
Leslie Johns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Chae Harris, C.O. McKinley, C.O. J. Umstead and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
