Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kelley v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Chad Kelley
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Guzman v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
as 2:2022cv03093
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Guzman
Defendant:
Coca Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Teamsters Local Union No. 1199 v. Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00732
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Local No. 1199 Teamsters Local Union No. 1199 and Teamsters Local Union No. 1199
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Dwyer v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00408
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dwyer
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. , Todd Beldhaus, Keith Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Privette v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Privette and Marilyn Priviette
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Jose A. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
