Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doughty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Edward James Doughty, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCain v. Farrar et al
as 2:2020cv03164
Defendant:
Lt. Doughty, Capt. Kenneth Farrar, Classification Earlena Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D McCain, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doughty v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Tony Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doughty v. Taylor et al
as 2:2018cv01197
Defendant:
Terrie Taylor, William R. Barker, Perry County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.C., et al
as 1:2018cv00513
Defendant:
Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.C. and John Does 1-25, John Does and Lyons, Doughty & Velhuis, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Tanisha Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Arnold et al v. Industrial Holdings Group, Inc.
as 2:2009cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jack Arnold and Robert Doughty
Defendant:
Industrial Holdings Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Arnold et al v. Industrial Holdings Group, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jack Arnold and Robert Doughty
Defendant:
Industrial Holdings Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Washington Mutual Bank v. Wike et al
as 2:2007cv01130
Plaintiff:
Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant:
Terry L. Wike, Teresa L. Doughty-Wike, Terry L. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
