Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01918
Plaintiff: David Hooper
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff: Betty Hooper
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff: Leonard Hooper
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05468
Plaintiff: Andrew Hooper
Defendant: C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02749
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hooper et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv03520
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation
Plaintiff: Charity Hooper and Jackie Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sparks v. Hooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00224
Plaintiff: William Sparks
Defendant: Hooper, Baliff 1, Baliff 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cassell et al v. Licking County Memorial Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Cassell, III, Randi Wagner and Angela Barrett
Defendant: Licking County Memorial Hospital, Hooper, Ranic Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Ervin et al
as 2:2016cv00478
Plaintiff: Clay Hooper
Defendant: Scott Ervin, Richard Cline and New Lexington, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Hooper
as 3:2014cv00241
Plaintiff: Peggy Katherine Baldwin
Defendant: Willie Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?