Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yatenga v. Brantel et al
as 2:2021cv05367
Plaintiff:
Mosheh Yatenga
Defendant:
LT Brantel, Officer Ryan Householder, Officer Parrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunnydale Farms, LLC et al v. EAP Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
James S. Smith, Melissa J. Smith, D. Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Encino Acquisition Partner Holdings, LLC, Siltstone Resources, LLC, EAP Operating, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03565
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN J. SMITH and CHARLES RANDALL SMITH
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00140
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Norma J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 2:2020cv01382
Petitioner:
Ivan J Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01044
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00807
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Smith
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv01448
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Victoria J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
