Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Curry, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Shiseido Americas Corporation, City of Obetz Police Department, Franklin County, Ohio Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. Lanos et al
as 3:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
Luna LaToya Bey and Aladdin Moroc Bey
Defendant:
Karen Lanos, A'senah Taylor, Danielle Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clarke v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00978
Plaintiff:
Katlin J. Clarke
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP v. 3.2 ACRES PERMANENT EASEMENT, AND 4.2 ACRES TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF LAND IN COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO et al
as 2:2014cv02650
Defendant:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD, Linda K. Kessler Living Trust, Tri-Star Energy Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02612
Plaintiff:
Loretta J. Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01754
Plaintiff:
Nancy J. Clark
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leach et al v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Leach , Amy Barket , Todd M. Brown and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati , Superintendent, Cincinnati Public Schools , Director of Human Relations, Cincinnati Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
