Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Kent-Parcell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kent-Parcell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kent v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kent
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hull v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Seain C. Hull
Defendant:
David Yost, Matthew Crall, Scott Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edelstein et al v. Flottman et al
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edelstein and S. E.
Defendant:
S. E., a Minor, Judge Ann Flottman, Magistrate Craig Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Handy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03656
Plaintiff:
Kent Handy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzales et al. v. The Ohio State University
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Edward Gonzales, Kent Kilgore, Adam Plouse and others
Defendant:
The Ohio State Univesity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sizemore et al v. ADT Solar, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
George Sizemore and Tyler Sizemore
Defendant:
ADT Solar, LLC and Kent Emerick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Forney v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Kent Forney
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kent v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Aniya Kent
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Petica v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02963
Plaintiff:
Kent Petica
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
