Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marquis v. OZUSA LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Martha Curry, OZUSA LLC and Miranda McGee
Plaintiff:
Justin Marquis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
v. Marquis et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Martha Curry, Justin Marquis, OZUSA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
v. Marquis et al
as 1:2020oe00003
Defendant:
Martha Curry, Justin Marquis, OZUSA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Statzer v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
as 1:2018cv00626
Petitioner:
Ralph Statzer
Respondent:
Warden Dave Marquis and Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Marquis Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00004
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Marquis Properties, LLC, Chad Deucher, Richard Clatfelter and others
Gray v. Mohr et al
as 1:2016cv01148
Plaintiff:
Daryl Gray
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Ohio Dept. Rehab. & Corr. and Dave Marquis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NetJets, Inc. et al v. Dichter
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
NetJets, Inc. , NJ Executive Services, Inc. , Marquis Jet Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanksley et al v. The State of Ohio et al
as 2:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Marquis Tanksley and Myra Tanksley
Defendant:
The State of Ohio , Columbus Developmental Center Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities , Franklin County Board of Developmental Disabilities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. City of Steubenville et al
as 2:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Paul Bowman, III
Defendant:
City of Steubenville, Cathy Davison, Teri English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2009cv00978
Petitioner:
Marquis Hairston and Marquis Hairston
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
