Cases 1 - 10 of 11
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Davis and Chaplain Alfred Marcus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Davis and Chaplain Alfred Marcus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02601
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Bey
Defendant:
Chaplain Blaire Smith and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Chaplain Alfred Marcus, Inspector Corby Free and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Reckel
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
David Warren Huffman
Defendant:
Chaplain Reckel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Pairan
as 2:2021cv03611
Defendant:
Ronald Morgan, Donald Morgan and Chaplain Pairan
Plaintiff:
David Warren Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstead v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2019cv04857
Defendant:
Dep Carmen, Sgt. Obrien, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Demarco Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heru v. State of Ohio Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Sakhu Maa Tem Heru
Defendant:
Mary Potter and Chaplain Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulraman v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00461
Plaintiff:
Abdul Abdulraman
Defendant:
Cynthia Davis, C/O Southworth, Captain Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
