Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Parker v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
Leah Parker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Stephen Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Terry Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Parker
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Smith v. Oppy et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Defendant:
Mr. J. Oppy, Mr. Chinn, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parker et al v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03826
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Parker and Ronald Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartshorn Kennett et al v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv03771
Defendant:
Elaine Hartshorn Kennett, Ricky Kennett, Elizabeth M Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M. Hartshorn Kennett and Ricky A. Kennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Parker v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03387
Petitioner:
Alton Parker
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sealy v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Dessalines Sealy
Respondent:
The United States of America, Ebonoluwa A. Taiwo, Timothy S. Mungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
