Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Stein v. Howell et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stein
Defendant:
Officer Rodney N Howell, Officer Ashley Henschen, Officer Alec Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ransom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02085
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Cherelle K. Ransom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ransom v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02408
Plaintiff:
Laura Ransom
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mahe v. Ransome et al
as 2:2021cv05192
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Mahe
Defendant:
Katrina Ransome, Suzanne Brooks, Ohio Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Burrows Paper Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv03824
Defendant:
Novolex Holdings, LLC and Burrows Paper Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ransom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ransom Humphrey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01556
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Doris Ransom Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alice Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom v. Commissioner of SSA
as 2:2019cv00515
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Mary Belle Ransom
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ransom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00507
Plaintiff:
Kanesha Ransom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Canders v. Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 2:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
Tijuana Lavern Canders
Defendant:
Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services, Jeremy Smitley, Zachary Turpin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
