Cases 141 - 150 of 1,482
Hammett v. Pontotoc County Sheriff et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Janice Hammett
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff and Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McVicker v. Muskogee Housing Authority
as 6:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Rosemary McVicker
Defendant:
Muskogee Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Phillips v. James et al
as 6:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Jesse James, Jessica Brown, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rahhal v. Okemah Pharmacy
as 6:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Okemah Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahhal v. The East Central Electric Co. et al
as 6:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
The East Central Electric Co., Jim Smith and Gary Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
White et al v. Matthews et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brandy White, TW, KW and others
Defendant:
Scott Matthews, Greater Muskogee Community Foundation and Muskogee Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Rahhal v. Liquor Store Owner Highway 48
as 6:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Liquor Store Owner Highway 48 and Liquor Store Owner-Highway 48
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
