Cases 21 - 30 of 10,212
Foltyniewicz v. City of Tahlequah et al
as 6:2024cv00331
Defendant:
The City of Tahlequah, Ryan Young and Ray Hammons
Plaintiff:
Randall Foltyniewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rowland v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00325
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Carla M. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Parker v. Magby
as 6:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Kolton Parker
Defendant:
Phillip Magby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Headrick v. David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
as 6:2024cv00323
Defendant:
David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Headrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trover v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Rachel Elizabeth Trover
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Singleton v. Trulite Glass & Aluminum Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00320
Defendant:
Jimmy Ray and Trulite Glass & Aluminum Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sandra Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Born v. USA
as 6:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Kalup Allen Born
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Boatman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Richard Eric Boatman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Minton v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2024cv00317
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Ronald Timothy Minton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
