Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Smith v. Cherokee County Governmental Building Authority
as 6:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bruce Lee Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Cherokee County Governmental Building Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burcum v. McCollum
as 6:2013cv00415
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Burcum, Sr.
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tiger v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Tiger, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oliver v. Hayes et al
as 6:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Oliver, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew Hayes, Robin Adair, Mike Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. H. J. Baker & Bro., Inc.
as 6:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Nelson D. Adams, Sr.
Defendant:
H. J. Baker & Bro., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Masri et al v. Roberts et al
as 6:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Hassan Masri and Suzanne Masri
Defendant:
Tommy Roberts, Sr. , Judy Roberts , John Does 1-3 and others
Counter_claimant:
Judy Roberts and Tommy Roberts, Sr.
Counter_defendant:
Hassan Masri and Suzanne Masri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Williams et al
as 6:2010cv00414
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roshon Roberts, Sr.
Defendant:
Danita G. Williams, Douglas W. Schmuck, Marion Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Taylor et al
as 6:2010cv00280
Petitioner:
Anthony Roshon Roberts, Sr.
Respondent:
Joseph Taylor and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chatman v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2010cv00071
Petitioner:
John T. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkinson et al v. Brown et al
as 6:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Hubert Wilkinson and Randall J. Gilbreath
Defendant:
James M. Brown, Sr., Clinton Johnson, Richard L. Dugger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
