Cases 31 - 40 of 312
Williams v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
Mario Williams
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Secretary of Interior, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harding v. Grisham et al
as 6:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Harding
Defendant:
William L Grisham, Love County Board of County Commissioners, Jeff Mullinax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Nunn
as 6:2021cv00373
Petitioner:
Brian G. Williams
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connor, John O and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Donica Charlene Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laffoon v. Joseph et al
as 6:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
William F. Laffoon
Defendant:
David C. Joseph and Ben Hilfiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Crow et al
as 6:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Chad William Reed
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Regina Beede and Core Civic of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
William Paul Cannon and William Paul Cannon, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Laffoon v. Joseph
as 6:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
William F. Laffoon
Defendant:
Judge David C. Joseph and David C. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
