Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins and Tony
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener and John E. Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Kyle E. Waters, Matthew Orendorff and Stacey Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Richison
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ashley D. Adams
Defendant:
E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Neasbitt v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Russell E. Neasbitt
Respondent:
Christie Quick, Greg Breslin and Wallace Coppedge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutherland v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Myrtle E. Sutherland
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rineheart v. Doyle et al
as 6:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
William Rineheart and William E. Rineheart
Defendant:
Nicole LaVonne Vernon Doyle and Mary Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beasley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Beasley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
