Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Attorney General, Pushmataha County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele et al v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Mike Steele, Jacob Sewell, Aubrey Cole and others
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Hicks
as 6:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Latisha Martin
Defendant:
Alexander S. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Parks v. Fritcher et al
as 6:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Defendant:
Eric Fritcher and Tara Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leachco, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission et al
as 6:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Leachco, Inc.
Defendant:
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Alexander Hoehn-Saric, Dana Baiocco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Bridges, II v. Louthan et al
as 6:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
David Louthan, Mike Elkins, Eric Fritcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Norwood et al
as 6:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Julia Dorman, Airnesto Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hicks
as 6:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Latisha Martin
Defendant:
Alexander S. Hicks and John Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
