Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sturdy v. Fallin et al
as 6:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jonna Lou Sturdy
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Scott Pruett and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Edmondson et al
as 6:2010cv00466
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Drew Edmondson, Joe Craig, Charlie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Parker et al
as 6:2010cv00283
Petitioner:
Mikel Ray Henderson
Respondent:
David L Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCormick v. Parker, et al
as 6:2010cv00117
Petitioner:
Robert Claude McCormick
Respondent:
Randy Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
Brad Henry, W.A. Drew Edmondson, Oklahoma Tax Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Lowery et al v. Edmondson et al
as 6:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lowery, James E. Lane and Elco Q. Pierce
Defendant:
Drew Edmondson, Justin Jones, Debbie L. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ake v. Edmondson et al
as 6:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Glen Burton Ake
Defendant:
Drew Edmondson, Justin Jones and Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Taylor et al
as 6:2009cv00200
Petitioner:
Danny D Hopper
Respondent:
Joseph Taylor, Justin Jones and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
