Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Wilson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Wilson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Hitchcock et al
as 6:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jennifer Hitchcock, Bryan Chris Pruitt, Rhonda Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harvey v. Brake et al
as 6:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Kyla Harvey
Defendant:
Jennifer Brake and Deanna Ammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Roberson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holt v. Turn 5, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Holt
Defendant:
TURN 5, INC., and Turn 5, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Holt et al v. Bump Boxes, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Holt
Defendant:
Bump Boxes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Holt et al v. Amazon.com, Inc
as 6:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Holt
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Parks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
