Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Amy Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Amy Suzanne Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
Carroll A. Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kenney v. Facilities Performance Group et al
as 6:2018cv00374
Defendant:
Facilities Performance Group and Emily D. Pearson
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Kenney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Pearson et al
as 6:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Christopher D-Wayne Young
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, John Sandersfield and Kevin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cline v. Valliant Village Apartments, LP et al
as 6:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Janet Cline
Defendant:
Valliant Village Apartments, LP, Southridge Apartments, Inc., Person Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Smith v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwin Smith
Defendant:
Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners, Charles Pearson, Rob Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Garvin et al
as 6:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Darryle D. Chatman
Defendant:
Jeremy Garvin, Lacy Rosson and Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayman v. Pearson et al
as 6:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wayman
Defendant:
Charles Pearson, Rob Frazier, Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
