Cases 121 - 130 of 329
Board of County Commissioners of Osage County, State of Oklahoma, The v. Purde Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00461
Defendant:
Purde Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Osage County, State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wickham v. Gibson et al
as 4:2018cv00449
Defendant:
Curtis Barnes, Carl Gibson, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00446
Petitioner:
Tracy Joevaun McGill
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wickham et al v. Gibson et al
as 4:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Terry Allen Wickham, Carl Gibson, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Dean Wickham and Paul Leroy Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCurley v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00429
Petitioner:
Kenneth K McCurley
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, James Yates and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Custard v. Harding et al
as 4:2018cv00407
Respondent:
Tammy Cartwright, State of Oklahoma, Prison Electrical Crew Supervisor and others
Petitioner:
Bob Allen Custard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Melanie Roberts
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Kristin Steuck and Rachel Mix
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardwell v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2018cv00199
Petitioner:
Christopher A Cardwell
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bryant
as 4:2018cv00123
Petitioner:
Joshua Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
