Cases 31 - 40 of 421
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton et al v. City of Locust Grove, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Deanna Shelton and Chloe Jennings
Defendant:
City of Locust Grove, Oklahoma, Jason Williams, Clay Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tubbs v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Paul Tubbs
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, R Russo and Police Officer Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. City of Broken, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
City of Broken, Oklahoma, City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, Tulsa county and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anderson
Defendant:
K Williams, A Perez and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rucker v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Rucker
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Michael Snyder, Will Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKee v. City of Skiatook, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tammy McKee
Defendant:
City of Skiatook, Oklahoma and Leianne Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Turner v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eugene James Turner
Defendant:
Amy Hall, Wendell Franklin and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
