Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Helm v. USA
as 4:2016cv00597
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathaniel P Helm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Sangha
as 4:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anoop P Sangha
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Cole v. Stodard et al
as 4:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lee Cole
Defendant:
John M Stodard , Mister "P" Express, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitcock et al v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Allen P Pitcock and Janet J Pitcock
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Pierson et al v. Andrews
as 4:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kenneth P Pierson and Paula Taylor
Defendant:
Don Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
John P Price
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen et al v. Semper Fidelis Oil & Gas, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Brian Allen , MASA Energy, LLC , Michael E Peterson-Baker and others
Defendant:
Semper Fidelis Oil & Gas, LLC, NUCO Energy, LLC, Nick's Oil and Gas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bowen et al v. BC Builders, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dennis Bowen and Vicki Bowen
Defendant:
BC Builders, LLC , A&P Concrete and Pools, LLC , Clay Tramonte and others
Counter_defendant:
Dennis Bowen and Vicki Bowen
Counter_claimant:
BC Builders, LLC , Clay Tramonte and Robert Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Integrated Business Technologies, LLC v. NetLink Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Integrated Business Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
NetLink Solutions, LLC , Bret P Grady , Tyler Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
