Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayan-Varnum v. Dayan et al
as 4:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Dayan-Varnum
Defendant:
Kathryn Dayan, Dava Dayan, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pierce v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00506
Petitioner:
Steven James Pierce
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis et al v. Morgan et al
as 4:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jared L David and Lindsay R Davis
Defendant:
Georgina Morgan, Mark Matheson, RH Operating Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 4:2020cv00521
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Susan L Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Linda Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips v. Austin Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Christopher Born, Carmen Nickel, Brittany Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
