Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong et al v. Health Care Service Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy S Armstrong and Kay S Armstrong
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation, BlueCross BlueShield of Oklahoma and Health Care Service Corporation a mutual legal reserve company doing business as BlueCross and BlueShield of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boggs v. Armstrong Relocation Co.
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Leah M Boggs
Defendant:
Armstrong Relocation Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Armstrong v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00524
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Givis et al v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00386
Petitioner:
Kris Givis, Jeremy Newton, Andre Fuller and others
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong et al v. Miller et al
as 4:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Gary Armstrong and Laurie Armstrong
Defendant:
Kaci Miller and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00359
Plaintiff:
Ernest L Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lynn Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
