Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadowski v. Lindly's Incorporated
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
Lindly's Incorporated doing business as Lindly's Propane
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Weeley v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Christopher Leo Weeley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Barnett v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Tiger Commissary Services
as 4:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Tiger Commissary Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 4:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, DO Hirsh, Amy Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Baldwin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barnett v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett, Christopher J Magnum and Chris Mangum
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell, Chaplin Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
