Cases 1 - 10 of 87
American Bank of Oklahoma v. Hayes et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
American Bank of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Steven Lee Hayes, Sr, United States of America Internal Revenue Service, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Culver v. Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Tierney Culver, Katelyn Arroyo, Nathan Bates and others
Defendant:
Saint Francis Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stephens et al v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Linh Stephens and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rodney Sparkman, April Seibert, James Hubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Henson v. Rankins
as 4:2022cv00348
Petitioner:
Anthony B Henson, Sr
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vann et al v. Vieana Ebbs Rose
as 4:2022cv00266
Defendant:
Vieana Ebbs Rose and Viola Brown
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Vann, Silas Young, Ruth Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Harris v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Steven Jermaine Harris, Sr
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stith v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2021cv00520
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Stith, Sr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Warden Whitten
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
