Cases 111 - 120 of 27,967
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Jail
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. et al
as 5:2024cv00253
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. doing business as Wal-Mart Stores Inc also known as Wal-Mart doing business as Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market, Wal-Mart and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Wallace v. Guthrie The City of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Defendant:
Guthrie The City of Oklahoma, Logan County Sheriff The and Michael Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. Katterhenry
as 5:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Dan Katterhenry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coomes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Colin Coomes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America et al v. Joint Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Reynaldo Solano, California State Of and others
Defendant:
Joint Technology Inc doing business as Revert Systems, Jim Patton, Dr. John Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
