Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Lambert v. Frontier Leasing Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Matthew Lambert
Defendant:
Frontier Leasing Inc and Wayne Allen Litherland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prentice v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Prentice
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kruse et al v. Howell
as 5:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Wayne Kruse and Mary Kruse
Defendant:
Garrett Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Johnson v. DeGiusti et al
as 5:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Timothy DeGiusti, Emily Fagan and Robert J Troester
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Talley v. English et al
as 5:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Talley
Defendant:
Jerry Wayne English, Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc, Alliant Specialty Insurance Services Inc doing business as Tribal First and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crenwelge v. Hammond et al
as 5:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Samuel Crenwelge
Defendant:
David Wayne Hammond and Kenneth J Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ibendahl v. Applied Industrial Coatings LLC
as 5:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Wayne Jason Ibendahl
Defendant:
Applied Industrial Coatings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00774
Plaintiff:
Johnny Wayne Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Stephens County, Javier Martinez and Deputy Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlister v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nickales McAlister
Defendant:
Stephens County, Wayne McKinney, Javier Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Balkman et al
as 5:2021cv00633
Defendant:
Tom Majors, Esq Timothy J Downing, Shon T Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
