Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Wickware et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 5:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
Roy Wickware
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 5:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Marion Ross
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnston et al v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Clint Johnston , Janeen Goodin and Marla Sharp
Defendant:
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Oklahoma , Health Care Service Corporation , Blue Cross & Blue Shield Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reddix v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Tammy Reddix
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , NV Organon , Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharpe v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert D Sharpe
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and Bill Citty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seamster v. Prater et al
as 5:2011cv01383
Plaintiff:
Willie L Seamster
Defendant:
David W Prater, Virgil Black, Vicki L Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00622
Plaintiff:
Harold D Sharp
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, David Miller and Eroll Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Newcastle Police Department et al
as 5:2009cv01309
Plaintiff:
Sandra J Sharp
Defendant:
Newcastle Police Department, Bristol and Bristol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Harold D Sharp
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Eroll Hancock and David Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sharp v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv01180
Plaintiff:
Trinka J Sharp
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
