Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Hatfield v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Bailey Hatfield
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
USAA Life Insurance Company v. Bailey et al
as 5:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
USAA Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Bailey, George Voss and Jimmie Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bailey et al v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 5:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Peter Bailey, Arlene OBrien, Dale Wilkins and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Bailey et al v. Franklin Corporation
as 5:2021cv00969
Plaintiff:
Peter Bailey and Tamara Bailey
Defendant:
Franklin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Owens v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, John Burton, Garfield County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latsos v. Rivers et al
as 5:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, John Burton, Sean Prock and others
Plaintiff:
Kallum Isaiah Eugene Latsos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00436
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, John Burton, Garfield County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ival Ray Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APMEX Inc v. Bailey
as 5:2020cv01028
Plaintiff:
APMEX Inc
Defendant:
Arlene Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lorelied v. Frye et al
as 5:2020cv00819
Plaintiff:
Kit Vivien Lorelied
Defendant:
Lance Frye, Kelly Baker and Kim Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Wilson et al
as 5:2019cv01147
Defendant:
Stephan Wilson, Sissy Osteen, Gary Sandefur and others
Plaintiff:
Whitney Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
