Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caremark LLC et al v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Caremark LLC and CaremarkPCS Health LLC
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bashant v. Drummond
as 5:2023cv00591
Petitioner:
Colin Lee Bashant
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Donald Williamson
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crenshaw v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Courtney Cordell Crenshaw
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Getner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Steven Jermaine Harris
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt and Getner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proctor v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Proctor
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
