Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Daggs v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jade Daggs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Charles Kerr, Ronnie Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Smith v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety and Matthew Rackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mills v. Tinsley et al
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Chris Ryan Mills
Defendant:
Josh Tinsley, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Oklahoma Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carney v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
as 5:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
Ray Neal Carney
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
