Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornwall v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv02456
Defendant:
S Malley, QUETTA BROWN-YARSIA, OSWALDO TAGLE MANRIQUE and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cornwall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2017cv02393
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KEVIN PIERCE , THOMAS HOGAN and COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 5:2016cv03291
Plaintiff:
MURICE O. PIERCE
Defendant:
READING HEALTH SYSTEM and READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
PIERCE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02904
Plaintiff:
ROGER PIERCE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JEFFREY WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2013cv05181
Plaintiff:
SHARON MARIE JENKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT DUFFY, ELAINE DUFFY, CONSTANCE PRINCIPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JENKINS v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2013cv03490
Plaintiff:
SHARON MARIE JENKINS
Defendant:
ROBERT DUFFY, ELAINE DUFFY, CONSTANCE PRINCIPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERCE v. STEINMART
as 5:2012cv00694
Plaintiff:
TAWNYA PIERCE
Defendant:
STEINMART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LANG et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF REGISTER OF WILLS AND CLERK OF ORPHANS' COURT et al
as 2:2011cv04638
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANG
Defendant:
ELIZABETH LANG HOUSER , MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF REGISTER OF WILLS AND CLERK OF ORPHANS' COURT , RONALD HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON et al v. MICHAEL et al
as 2:2007cv04909
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JOHNSON, JEFFREY W. PIERCE and CLAUDIA L. PIERCE
Defendant:
DONALD H. MICHAEL, JR., KEVIN JONES, ANDREW MEDELLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
