Cases 1 - 10 of 171
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICES et al
as 2:2024cv02322
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICES, PHILADELPHIA POLICES and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Roher
as 2:2023cv05111
Plaintiff:
George Jones
Defendant:
Police Officer Eugene Roher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHITAW
as 2:2023cv05028
Not Yet Classified:
VANOKA JONES WASHITAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. SHIPIRO et al
as 2:2023cv04879
Plaintiff:
JOHN JONES, JR
Defendant:
JOSH SHIPIRO, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv04861
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04644
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER-LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
