Cases 11 - 20 of 66
ALEXANDER v. SRGT. VINGALISS et al
as 2:2021cv04633
Plaintiff:
MUBARAK ALEXANDER
Defendant:
SRGT. VINGALISS, SRGT. HARTMAN, NURSE KRISTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2021cv02860
Respondent:
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1, MADELINE QUINN and others
Petitioner:
MELVIN BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARK WAHL, LORIE EASON and CRAIG MCEWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02830
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CARPENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02834
Plaintiff:
Jazmar Thomas
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 1, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, WAKU, GEO SECURE SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER, JOHN DOE 2, also known to Plaintiff as CORRECTION OFFICER, NIBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DELGADO v. RADDAD et al
as 2:2021cv02534
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O RADDAD and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELGADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAXWELL v. SOBER et al
as 2:2021cv01939
Defendant:
JAMIE SOBER, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DANA MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASIANO v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv00918
Defendant:
JANE DOE, DEPUTY WARDEN MCFADDEN, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS CASIANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. KING et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Defendant:
NANCY GIANNETTA, LEON A. KING, II and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff:
RAKYM DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
