Cases 1 - 10 of 22
FLAMER v. LYNN et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER
Defendant:
LT. LYNN, MUHAMMED and SERGEANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARINELLI et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MARINELLI, TEDOR DAVIDO, MELVIN KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, GEORGE M LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURDLE v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04887
Plaintiff:
RAMELL S. HURDLE
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, DAVID H. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv04576
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JOSEPH C. KERSZNIAK and GOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BELL
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT and ERIC LOCKE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv05189
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, DELANCY, MAY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05314
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, M. LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALVAREZ et al v. BROCKENBERG et al
as 2:2011cv05086
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALVAREZ, JAMES MCCANTS and STEVEN MASTER
Defendant:
BROCKENBERG, DELANEY, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
